Saturday, January 31, 2009



  1. How would modern
    science give us different ways to speak of God the creator?


  2. Here in exile,
    when one would surmise that they would worry abut the defeat of
    their god, perhaps the insignificance of their god in light of the
    conquering, Israel makes a remarkable move and see the creator god
    as a god above all. Just as the people feel weak next to empires, so
    small are all those powerful forces to God.


  3. Fretheim in God
    and World (187) that Israel is less concerned about power per se,
    but the power of god to do a new, creative activity.


  4. Creation and
    redemption themes are nicely interwoven here and all the way
    through, esp. chs. 40-55


  5. Tohu/chaos appears
    here in v.23 Brown (Ethos,230) reminds us that in the midst of the
    devastation of the land and hopes, it was important for the Creator
    who stretches out the heavento do a new thing.To those who did it
    God will come as a devastating dry wind or as a flood to wither the
    crops of others, but god will see Israel as a garden (622) Everyone
    needs to rest, but not God (v. 28) Brown:268


  6. Brueggemann
    (TOT:538) sees combat shifted to the rhetorical arena. V. 26 has the
    host-God is the creator even of them. NIV fears this, so it turns
    them in the starry host.


  7. Hanson
    (Intepretation30-32) reminds us that Isaiah clears the skies of any
    power approaching that of /god, idol or astral deity. In the end
    idols offer cheap power, cheap grace. Only the everlasting one does
    not weary. The people are called to remember the Creator God.


  8. We cannot be so
    quick as to claim we know what god is up to. God’sways are u
    searchable (v. 28)


  9. The ending is
    justly famous for giving solace to the weary. It is a new spirit to
    lifeless people, similar to the valley of dry bones in Ezek. 37.




No comments: