The thesis of this fine book is solid. Tensions were built
in to the dream of Israel .
Thos e tensions continue as Israel
is in its seventh decade as a nation. Part of the dream was that Israel would be
a model state, a light to the nations. Others hoped that it would be granted
statehood, so the at Jews could exist in a normal situation as a state just
like other states.
At times, the author’s encyclopedic knowledge of the
different fissures within the Zionist projects is a bit much for a casual
reader. On the other hand, he knows some much about the initial cleavage points
in the dream of a place to call home after the years of Diaspora. No, Zionism
was not a unified, coherent ideology, but it was more a projection of the hopes
of both secular and sacred, of socialist vision and messianic dreams of
different adherents.
For instance some dreamt that Israel would b eth eland of a 7
hour work week. Others imagined it to be a multi-ethnic model of a commonwealth.
Some saw it as the start of a messianic
age, and others saw it as an impediment toward God’s timetable for a messianic
chapter. Some ,merely wanted it to be a nation-state just like any other. The
different proposals were wanting a place that could be called a homeland,
instead of always being treated and viewed as the other.
The Balfour Declaration was vague on the terms of a land
grant to a national home in Palestine ,
so it could be filled with what was projected on to it. What would its borders
be? Would it be a “Jewish state” or not? Some dreamed of alternative homelands
not in historical Israel
at all. Even a definition of being a Jew met with varying interpretations. Now a Diaspora exists as people emigrate from Israel and some
live both in Israel
and of all places, Berlin .
Israel is s a society riven
with some fault lines that will take herculean efforts to stabilize or
harmonize, let alone seeking harmony with its neighbors and the post ’67 victory
that s transformed it into greater Israel .
No comments:
Post a Comment