I took a few days after Easter to visit our
daughter and son-in-law. while there, i went to a large WWI exhibit at University of Texas.So much death was visited upon the
world in that senseless struggle. My eye was caught by an old filmed piece by
the author of Sherlock Holmes, Arthur Conan Doyle. He lost a son to the carnage
of the war. Well before that, the author of the cerebral, logical Holmes was
fascinated by spiritualism. My mind rocketed back to the civil War carnage and
Mary Todd Lincoln’s interest in trying to converse with the dead through a
spirit medium. Not long after the war The Gates Ajar was an enormously
popular depiction of heavne as an extension of Victorian-era domesticity.
While in Austin
the book and movie Heaven Is For Real was featured at a trivia contest.It
dawned on me that many churches are reading the “Doubting Thomas” John 20
passage. this Sunday. Too often that passage has been used as a hammer to
slam Thomas. He is a foil to show how great we are who accept Easter accounts.
Far too often, doubting Thomas gets used to try to halt people questioning ro
struggling with a point of doctrine or practice. Notice that Thomas was the
only one not ot have an appearance by Jesus at first. Notice also that Jesus
does not seem to criticize Thomas. Thomas is given what the disciples received
earlier in the week. Even the phrase, doubting, is not quite right. it is much
closer to believing or disbelieving in English.
In the Genesis stories of the patriarchs, Jacob,
after wrestling with a mysterious figure, is given the name Israel . it has
been translated as wrestling with God.In that sense thomas was a true child of Israel ,
struggling to grasp the enormity of Easter. When Jesus gives a summary of
the command to love God, he adds the words to love God with the mind. So
instead of blind faith, loving God with the mind would seem to include
questions, doubts, and hypotheticals.
It is striking to me that the folks who decry
Thomas demanding some sort of evidence for Easter flock to material such as
reports of near death experiences. The motive seems to be the precise motive of
Thomas, evidence, even tangible proo of an experience of life after death.
While discounting vast troves of scientific evidence on evolution or climate
change, skepticism turns into utter credulity in the face of out of body
experiences, especially if they conform to our current dreams of heaven.
Over the years, i have done a number of bible
studies in centers for the elderly. When i give them a chance to examine a question
of the faith, they often center around the afterlife. In particular, they are
seeking some assurance that they will truly see their loved ones and be truly
seen by them. As Springsteen sings in The Wall, “if your eyes could break
through this black stone/would they recognize me?” I empathize with the quest,
with my brother long gone and my mother a few years passed. Memory is a salve,
and at times, we are hurtled back into time by a song or a hint of fragrance.
Perhaps heaven will be a version of the movie What Dreams May Come, where we create a vision of bliss. Our visions of heaven are colored by our own culture, desires, and missed and made steps on the ladder of life. The Bible gives but glimpses of a future in the great beyond, and perhaps that is a way for us to project our best dreams. In the end, how do we even begin to try to express being enfolded in the love of God forever?
No comments:
Post a Comment