How would modern
science give us different ways to speak of God the creator?
Here in exile,
when one would surmise that they would worry abut the defeat of
their god, perhaps the insignificance of their god in light of the
conquering, Israel makes a remarkable move and see the creator god
as a god above all. Just as the people feel weak next to empires, so
small are all those powerful forces to God.
Fretheim in God
and World (187) that Israel is less concerned about power per se,
but the power of god to do a new, creative activity.
Creation and
redemption themes are nicely interwoven here and all the way
through, esp. chs. 40-55
Tohu/chaos appears
here in v.23 Brown (Ethos,230) reminds us that in the midst of the
devastation of the land and hopes, it was important for the Creator
who stretches out the heavento do a new thing.To those who did it
God will come as a devastating dry wind or as a flood to wither the
crops of others, but god will see Israel as a garden (622) Everyone
needs to rest, but not God (v. 28) Brown:268
Brueggemann
(TOT:538) sees combat shifted to the rhetorical arena. V. 26 has the
host-God is the creator even of them. NIV fears this, so it turns
them in the starry host.
Hanson
(Intepretation30-32) reminds us that Isaiah clears the skies of any
power approaching that of /god, idol or astral deity. In the end
idols offer cheap power, cheap grace. Only the everlasting one does
not weary. The people are called to remember the Creator God.
We cannot be so
quick as to claim we know what god is up to. God’sways are u
searchable (v. 28)
The ending is
justly famous for giving solace to the weary. It is a new spirit to
lifeless people, similar to the valley of dry bones in Ezek. 37.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment